new thought-term: textual revision as punishment (see what AI says)

By Ouyang Yu

 Textual revision as punishment sits at a strange crossroads between authority and intimacy. To revise someone’s words is not like fining them or banning them; it enters the body of their thinking. It presumes proximity—I know your language well enough to correct it—and that presumption is precisely what gives the act its punitive charge. When revision is imposed rather than invited, it stops being an act of care and becomes a disciplinary gesture, a way of saying: your meaning may stand, but only after it has been reshaped to pass inspection.

For a writer, this kind of punishment cuts deeper than censorship. Censorship leaves a blank; enforced revision leaves a simulacrum. The text remains, but the voice is altered, domesticated, sometimes made to speak against its own grain. What is punished is not merely content but temperament—tone, rhythm, hesitation, excess. The writer is taught, through edits, what kinds of sentences are allowed to survive. Over time, the lesson migrates inward, and self-censorship replaces the external hand.

There is also something judicial about compulsory revision. It mimics due process: objections are raised, amendments proposed, compliance rewarded with publication or circulation. Yet the rules are rarely explicit. The writer must infer the law from the scars left on the page. In this sense, revision becomes a pedagogy of obedience, training writers to anticipate correction before it arrives. The punishment is effective precisely because it presents itself as improvement.

What makes this especially unjust is that revision wears the mask of neutrality. Editors and institutions can claim they are refining clarity, accessibility, or standards, while in fact enforcing ideological or aesthetic conformity. The writer who resists is cast as difficult, unprofessional, or naïve about “how things work.” Thus punishment is laundered through professionalism, and coercion through craft.

Yet revision is also inseparable from writing itself, which is what complicates any easy condemnation. Writers revise constantly; they punish themselves with ruthless precision. The difference is agency. Self-revision is a wager with one’s own limits. Punitive revision is an assertion of power over those limits. It replaces the writer’s internal necessity with an external demand.

Seen this way, textual revision as punishment is less about correcting texts than about regulating who gets to speak, and how. It does not silence outright; it instructs. And perhaps that is its most enduring effect—not the altered sentence on the page, but the quieter one that never gets written at all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

002, from Poetry Remarks

By Ouyang Yu
Image
Mel C. Thompson Publishing, San Francisco, 2013, p. 23. [I said 'no page number' because my lower ear mark concealed it, my apologies. Then I thought: What a fantastic idea if there's no page numbers! I have a book that has no Contents although it timidly carries page numbers. See Two Hearts, Two Tongues and Rain-coloured Eyes . Wild Peony, 2002. In future, I'd make a poetry book with no Contents and no page numbers. Why make things so easy for people that they won't even bother reading?] This book is long out of print, so don't start thinking that I'm trying to promote something. I've only got one copy in the world and I'm not selling it.
Read more

LOWER DOWNS, RUBBISH AND LOW POETRY by Ouyang Yu

By Ouyang Yu
Beauty is so far from being the dominant principle of modern poetry that many of the most splendid modern works are clearly portrayals of ugliness - Friedrich Schlegel ( On the Study of Greek Poetry , 1797) Contemporary Chinese poetry has unashamedly turned from the sublime and sacred to the vulgar and profane. In April 1999 at the Panfeng Conference in Pinggu County, Beijing, poets split into two camps, the  zhishi fenzi  (intellectual) and the  minjian . 1  The poets in the intellectual camp (Wang Jiaxin, Ouyang Jianghe, Xi Chuan, Zang Di and others) were mostly well-published, anthologised, critically acclaimed, well-travelled and internationally well-connected. As university professor and poetry critic Cheng Guangwei noted, much of their poetry reflects the influences of Western literary masters such as Yeats, Rilke, Lowell, Pound, Baudelaire, Milosz, Pasternak and Brodsky. 2  The  minjian camp (Yu Jian, Yi Sha, Xu Jiang and others) critiqued these infl...
Read more

Self Publishing, a poem by Ouyang Yu

By Ouyang Yu
In a way, everything is self publishing. When you open your mouth to talk, you are self publishing because you don’t want someone else to speak for you even if he or she were the speech writer for Howard or Bush or Mao Zedong. When the rain decides to fall it is self publishing, on a regional scale, sometimes on a statewide scale. You can’t dismiss it as unworthily self publishing because it doesn’t fall on a national scale or international scale. Rivers in the world are self publishing on a daily and nightly basis. Even a little creek is self publishing when it winds its way through an industrial zone clogged with toxicity and waste. Birds never remain quiet because they don’t get paid for calling, their ways of self publishing that never is actually recorded in human history, not even in birds’ history, and when sometimes it does get recorded as in relaxation music they still don’t get paid and they still keep singing, their ways of self publishing. Some great self publish...
Read more