5123431321...

By Ouyang Yu


ChatGPT explains as follows (22/12/2025):

Here’s what can be said from the image itself, and then a few plausible interpretations—because without author context, this kind of notation is inherently ambiguous.

What is visibly there (no interpretation yet)

  • A sheet of paper with rows of handwritten digits, mostly 1–7, occasionally 8.

  • The numbers are grouped irregularly, sometimes separated by spaces, sometimes run together.

  • The title shown above the image is “5123431321…”, which matches the style of the handwritten sequences.

  • There are no symbols, operators, or obvious arithmetic structure (no +, −, ×, =).

  • The handwriting suggests deliberate sequencing, not random jotting.

So this is not:

  • a calculation

  • a standard mathematical proof

  • a phone number list (too long, wrong grouping)

  • a calendar/date notation

Likely interpretations (ranked by probability)

1. A self-referential or procedural number sequence

The opening 5123431321 is a strong clue.
It resembles generated sequences rather than recorded data.

This kind of writing often comes from:

  • iterative rules (“write what you see”)

  • transformations applied repeatedly

  • private constraint systems (e.g. “replace X with Y, then repeat”)

In other words: process-driven numbers, not values.

2. A personal encoding system (most likely)

The repetition of 1–7 is telling.

That range strongly aligns with:

  • days of the week

  • musical scale degrees

  • stroke counts

  • structural markers rather than quantities

This is typical of:

  • writers

  • poets

  • composers

  • diarists experimenting with form

In such cases, numbers replace language, not the other way around.

3. Anti-semantic writing (numbers used to avoid meaning)

This fits very well with experimental literary practice.

Instead of:

words → meaning

You get:

pattern → rhythm → residue of meaning

The fact that the numbers are handwritten (not typed) matters:
it keeps gesture while stripping lexical meaning.

This is often used to:

  • exhaust narrative

  • test memory

  • resist interpretation

4. What it almost certainly is not

  • ❌ A known mathematical sequence (not Fibonacci, not Look-and-Say, not primes)

  • ❌ A standard cipher (no key symmetry, no alphabet mapping consistency)

  • ❌ Random numbers (too structured, too repetitive)

How to read it productively

Instead of asking “What does it mean?”, ask:

  • What rule might produce this?

  • Why 1–7 and not 0–9?

  • Why handwritten?

  • Why does the title stop with …?

Seen this way, the image functions more like:

  • a trace of thinking

  • a ritual

  • a procedural poem

Bottom line

What you’re showing is not meant to be decoded cleanly.
It’s meant to be noticed, followed, and broken off from.

If you want, I can:

  • try reconstructing a possible generating rule

  • rewrite it as a conceptual text explanation

  • or help you frame it critically (literary / conceptual-art context)


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

002, from Poetry Remarks

By Ouyang Yu
Image
Mel C. Thompson Publishing, San Francisco, 2013, p. 23. [I said 'no page number' because my lower ear mark concealed it, my apologies. Then I thought: What a fantastic idea if there's no page numbers! I have a book that has no Contents although it timidly carries page numbers. See Two Hearts, Two Tongues and Rain-coloured Eyes . Wild Peony, 2002. In future, I'd make a poetry book with no Contents and no page numbers. Why make things so easy for people that they won't even bother reading?] This book is long out of print, so don't start thinking that I'm trying to promote something. I've only got one copy in the world and I'm not selling it.
Read more

LOWER DOWNS, RUBBISH AND LOW POETRY by Ouyang Yu

By Ouyang Yu
Beauty is so far from being the dominant principle of modern poetry that many of the most splendid modern works are clearly portrayals of ugliness - Friedrich Schlegel ( On the Study of Greek Poetry , 1797) Contemporary Chinese poetry has unashamedly turned from the sublime and sacred to the vulgar and profane. In April 1999 at the Panfeng Conference in Pinggu County, Beijing, poets split into two camps, the  zhishi fenzi  (intellectual) and the  minjian . 1  The poets in the intellectual camp (Wang Jiaxin, Ouyang Jianghe, Xi Chuan, Zang Di and others) were mostly well-published, anthologised, critically acclaimed, well-travelled and internationally well-connected. As university professor and poetry critic Cheng Guangwei noted, much of their poetry reflects the influences of Western literary masters such as Yeats, Rilke, Lowell, Pound, Baudelaire, Milosz, Pasternak and Brodsky. 2  The  minjian camp (Yu Jian, Yi Sha, Xu Jiang and others) critiqued these infl...
Read more

Self Publishing, a poem by Ouyang Yu

By Ouyang Yu
In a way, everything is self publishing. When you open your mouth to talk, you are self publishing because you don’t want someone else to speak for you even if he or she were the speech writer for Howard or Bush or Mao Zedong. When the rain decides to fall it is self publishing, on a regional scale, sometimes on a statewide scale. You can’t dismiss it as unworthily self publishing because it doesn’t fall on a national scale or international scale. Rivers in the world are self publishing on a daily and nightly basis. Even a little creek is self publishing when it winds its way through an industrial zone clogged with toxicity and waste. Birds never remain quiet because they don’t get paid for calling, their ways of self publishing that never is actually recorded in human history, not even in birds’ history, and when sometimes it does get recorded as in relaxation music they still don’t get paid and they still keep singing, their ways of self publishing. Some great self publish...
Read more