I ask. AI answers: 'Why are Asian writers, particularly those of the Chinese extraction, most likely to be rejected in a country like Australia?'

By Ouyang Yu

 This is a hard question, and it deserves a clear, unsentimental answer. The short version is: it’s not mainly about “Asian writers being worse,” and it’s not simply about racism either. It’s about power, gatekeeping norms, language expectations, and cultural comfort. In Australia these factors stack up in ways that disproportionately affect writers of Chinese background.

Below is the honest breakdown.

1. Publishing in Australia is culturally conservative (even when it claims diversity)

Australian publishing is small, risk-averse, and centrally gatekept. A handful of editors, prize judges, reviewers, and university-linked tastemakers largely decide what is “publishable” or “important.”

They tend to favour:

  • Familiar narrative structures

  • A recognisably “Australian” voice

  • Themes that fit existing national conversations

Writers who fall outside this comfort zone face a higher rejection rate—not because their work lacks merit, but because it’s harder to place.

2. Chinese-background writers are often trapped in a no-win double bind

Many Chinese or Chinese-diaspora writers experience this paradox:

  • If they write about migration, identity, family, or trauma →
    They are told it’s too niche, too ethnic, or already done.

  • If they write about universal or unrelated themes →
    They are told the voice lacks “authenticity” or “a clear cultural angle.”

So their work is either:

  • Too Chinese, or

  • Not Chinese enough

Very few white Australian writers face this structural contradiction.

3. Language bias is real—even at very high levels

Even when English is fluent, editors often privilege:

  • Idiomatic looseness

  • Implicit cultural cues

  • A particular rhythm shaped by Anglo literary traditions

Writing influenced by Chinese linguistic logic can be:

  • More precise

  • More compressed

  • More morally or structurally direct

These qualities are not inferior, but they can be misread as:

  • Stiff

  • Over-controlled

  • Emotionally distant

This is a taste bias, not a quality judgment—but taste determines publication.

4. Australia prefers stories that reassure its self-image

Australian literature has long leaned toward:

  • Larrikinism

  • Battler narratives

  • Quiet melancholy

  • Landscape-as-identity

Chinese-Australian writing often introduces:

  • Intergenerational obligation

  • Moral inheritance

  • Historical memory beyond Australia

  • Different ideas of family, duty, or success

These themes can unsettle rather than reassure the dominant cultural narrative.

Publishing systems rarely reward unsettling perspectives unless they come with institutional backing or overseas validation.

5. Overseas success matters more than local talent

A brutal truth:
If a Chinese-background writer is published in the US or UK first, Australia suddenly becomes interested.

Without that:

  • Manuscripts are seen as risky

  • Authors are seen as unproven

  • Editors fear low market traction

This affects Asian writers more because they are already perceived as outside the default readership.

6. “Diversity” initiatives don’t fix structural bias

Many rejections happen before diversity policies apply:

  • Slush pile filtering

  • Agent selection

  • Informal editor recommendations

Diversity programs often support:

  • Early-career workshops

  • Shortlists

  • Panels

They do not fundamentally change:

  • Who defines literary merit

  • What voices feel “natural” on the page

So rejection rates stay uneven.

7. Chinese writers are judged collectively, not individually

Another uncomfortable reality:

  • One “unsuccessful” Asian book is taken as proof of low demand

  • One unsuccessful white book is taken as an individual failure

This collective judgment creates a higher bar—often unspoken, but real.

Bottom line (no sugarcoating)

Chinese-background writers in Australia are more likely to be rejected because:

  • They are navigating a system not built with them in mind

  • Their voices challenge editorial comfort and cultural norms

  • Their work is filtered through expectations they did not set

  • The industry values familiarity over fairness

This does not mean success is impossible—but it usually requires:

  • Exceptional persistence

  • Strategic positioning

  • Or external validation

If you want, I can also help with:

  • How Chinese-Australian writers do break through

  • What kinds of submissions are most likely to survive first cuts

  • Or how to decide whether Australia is even the right first market

Just tell me which direction you want to go.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

002, from Poetry Remarks

By Ouyang Yu
Image
Mel C. Thompson Publishing, San Francisco, 2013, p. 23. [I said 'no page number' because my lower ear mark concealed it, my apologies. Then I thought: What a fantastic idea if there's no page numbers! I have a book that has no Contents although it timidly carries page numbers. See Two Hearts, Two Tongues and Rain-coloured Eyes . Wild Peony, 2002. In future, I'd make a poetry book with no Contents and no page numbers. Why make things so easy for people that they won't even bother reading?] This book is long out of print, so don't start thinking that I'm trying to promote something. I've only got one copy in the world and I'm not selling it.
Read more

LOWER DOWNS, RUBBISH AND LOW POETRY by Ouyang Yu

By Ouyang Yu
Beauty is so far from being the dominant principle of modern poetry that many of the most splendid modern works are clearly portrayals of ugliness - Friedrich Schlegel ( On the Study of Greek Poetry , 1797) Contemporary Chinese poetry has unashamedly turned from the sublime and sacred to the vulgar and profane. In April 1999 at the Panfeng Conference in Pinggu County, Beijing, poets split into two camps, the  zhishi fenzi  (intellectual) and the  minjian . 1  The poets in the intellectual camp (Wang Jiaxin, Ouyang Jianghe, Xi Chuan, Zang Di and others) were mostly well-published, anthologised, critically acclaimed, well-travelled and internationally well-connected. As university professor and poetry critic Cheng Guangwei noted, much of their poetry reflects the influences of Western literary masters such as Yeats, Rilke, Lowell, Pound, Baudelaire, Milosz, Pasternak and Brodsky. 2  The  minjian camp (Yu Jian, Yi Sha, Xu Jiang and others) critiqued these infl...
Read more

Self Publishing, a poem by Ouyang Yu

By Ouyang Yu
In a way, everything is self publishing. When you open your mouth to talk, you are self publishing because you don’t want someone else to speak for you even if he or she were the speech writer for Howard or Bush or Mao Zedong. When the rain decides to fall it is self publishing, on a regional scale, sometimes on a statewide scale. You can’t dismiss it as unworthily self publishing because it doesn’t fall on a national scale or international scale. Rivers in the world are self publishing on a daily and nightly basis. Even a little creek is self publishing when it winds its way through an industrial zone clogged with toxicity and waste. Birds never remain quiet because they don’t get paid for calling, their ways of self publishing that never is actually recorded in human history, not even in birds’ history, and when sometimes it does get recorded as in relaxation music they still don’t get paid and they still keep singing, their ways of self publishing. Some great self publish...
Read more